Tours were conducted of the old county courthouse in Bunnell yesterday to give both prospective buyers or users and the public a chance to see the property up close and ask questions.
Palm Coast, FL – August 10, 2014 – A committee of seven tasked by County Commissioners to make recommendations for the disposition of the old Bunnell courthouse conducted public tours of the building yesterday. The committee’s goal was to provide potential users/buyers, elected officials and voters a chance to see the structure up close to dispel rumors that sprouted after the City of Bunnell declined the county’s gift of the building.
The 46,600 square foot building consists of two sections; the original two-story courthouse in front with a larger, more recent three-story addition in the rear.
First, the rumors. The building was not infested with mold. Second, while there had been a few leaks, repairs had been completed and there was no evidence of current leaks or serious water damage. The roof is reportedly in good condition, as are the air conditioners.
I was doubly surprised as I went through the building with the first tour group. Clearly, both parts of the building are in better condition than I had anticipated. But the sense of “historical significance” of the original building's interior was lost on me. It’s old and memorable, but not historically significant. The architecture is unimpressive, as are the woodwork and finish carpentry.
The original building is cut up into many small rooms. Several load bearing walls and vault storage rooms restrict reconfiguration of space. Some in my tour group suggested it would be appropriate for law offices. That use would also be historically appropriate.
The rear addition makes no pretense toward architectural significance. It’s simply a rectangular, three-story commercial building with several large rooms. It’s in pretty good condition and could be easily reconfigured for almost any use.
I think it’s unlikely that the combined structure will be suitable for a single user. It’s a lot of square footage and the two sections of the building are dissimilar. More likely it will be divided among several users.
Opening the building to a public tour was a great idea. I had commented weeks ago that the best and highest use might be a vacant lot. The committee has to consider all possibilities, but after taking the tour, I’m thinking the building will find users.