Newsletter – 2007 Single Family Residential Home Market Analysis and 2008 Predictions

The final numbers are in for a bad year in residential real estate. Will 2008 show improvement?

January 1, 2008Palm Coast, FLGoToby.com closes its first calendar year and the housing market in Palm Coast and Flagler County, as well as nationally, closes its worst year since the 80’s. But the slide is two years old. How far did it drop? Are we at the bottom? When will it start up again?  The numbers tell the story.

 

I track three sectors of the local residential market closely:

  • Single family residential homes – Single family homes make up the core of the real estate market. No matter what is happening in the larger economy, people move each year due to job changes, down sizing, ill health, family issues, etc. These people represent the major non-discretionary component of the market.
  • Palm Coast Lots (PCL)Palm Coast lots represent the closest thing to a commodity in real estate. They represent the original 40,000 plus lots originally platted by ITT when Palm Coast was first planned. Approximately 10,000 remain vacant and other than the salt water canal frontage lots, are similar.
  • Condominiums – The Palm Coast area is popular as a retirement, vacation, or second home market destination. Hence the large number of condominiums here. The condo component is largely second home and investment driven.

 

Data used is that reported by the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) which does not include "sale by owner" or property sold directly by developers or builders. This report covers single family residential homes only. Palm Coast lots and condominiums will be dealt with in a subsequent newsletter next week.

 

 

Single Family Homes

 

Median Selling Price:

 

For each month since January 2006, the median selling price for existing single family homes in Flagler County has dropped from the same month in the previous year. December 2007’s median selling price, $190,000 represents a drop of 17.2 percent from December 2006‘s $229,500 and a drop of 27 percent from the December 2005 peak of $259,950.

 

  

Median Selling Price for Existing Single Family Residential Homes
 

Year

Year

’05-’06

Year

’06-’07

Month

2005

2006

%Change

2007

% Change

Jan

$206,000

$252,250

22.45%

$220,000

-12.78%

Feb

186,000

259,900

39.73%

222,000

-14.58%

Mar

202,000

245,000

21.29%

231,200

-5.63%

Apr

205,000

258,000

25.85%

216,000

-16.28%

May

209,900

250,000

19.10%

215,000

-14.00%

Jun

214,450

247,000

15.18%

214,950

-12.98%

Jul

232,000

237,000

2.16%

220,000

-7.17%

Aug

230,500

236,000

2.39%

215,000

-8.90%

Sep

231,000

250,000

8.23%

205,000

-18.00%

Oct

240,000

244,900

2.04%

209,500

-14.45%

Nov

239,900

225,000

-6.21%

195,450 

-13.13% 

Dec

259,950

229,500

-11.71%

 190,000

 -17.21%

 

 

Selling Price per square foot of living area:

 

The median price per living square feet finished with a December low of $99.52. This is the first time since 2004 that this measure has been below $100/square foot and represents a 29 percent drop from the $139.37 seen in December 2005.

 

Total sales volume:

 

While both median sale price and median price/square foot give a good indication of how far the average value of Flagler County single family homes has fallen, they do not tell the whole story. The economy is driven by volume, not price alone. It’s the volume that pays real estate commissions and construction workers. It feeds government coffers with fees. In the fourth quarter of 2007, sales of single family homes produced $70 million. The peak of $244 million was achieved in the third quarter of 2005. That’s a 71 percent decrease. For Flagler County alone, this represents a decrease of $1,218,000 in deed document stamp fee revenues (for single family homes sold through MLS).

 

 

Sales Volume for Single Family Residential Homes   ($thousands)

 

Year

Year

’05-’06

Year

’06-’07

Month

2005

2006

%Change

2007

% Change

Jan

$35,812

$43,855

22.46%

$34,295

-21.80%

Feb

35,340

35,265

-.210%

34.584

-1.93%

Mar

55.598

49,974

-10.12%

34,226

-31.51%

Apr

68,296

40,726

-40.37%

30.033

-26.26%

May

70,472

55,267

-21.58%

34,426

-37.71%

Jun

87,993

56,801

-35.45%

29,769

-49.35%

Jul

86,904

40,559

-53.33%

34,133

-15.84%

Aug

86,329

40,526

-53.06%

29,373

-27.52%

Sep

70,578

37,915

-46.28%

19,200

-49.36%

Oct

73,445

41,348

-43.70%

21,452

-48.12%

Nov

61,405

23,754

-61.32%

18,830 

-20.73% 

Dec

58,030

29,290

-49.53%

 18,136

 -38.08%

  

Building permits:

 

The number of building permits issued by Palm Coast for single family residential homes dropped from 2,915 in 2005 to 1,141 in 2006, then to 418 in 2007. At today’s level of impact and permitting fees (over $18,500 per new home), that represents a $46 million revenue loss to Palm Coast and the Flagler County School District.

 

Absorption rate:

 

The absorption rate is defined as the total number of properties listed for sale divided by the number of recent monthly sales. It’s a rough measure of the number of month’s sales that are in the available inventory for sale – the higher the absorption rate, the softer the market. Generally, any rate above seven indicates a buyer’s market. I measured absorption rates three times in 2007. In June, I measured the Palm Coast sections of Cypress Knolls, Indian Trails, Lehigh Woods, Matanzas Woods, Palm Harbor, Pine Grove, Pine Lakes, Quail Hollow, and Seminole Woods. I also measured Flagler County two times. The results are summarized in the table.

 

Absorption Rates for Single Family Homes
  June 2007 Aug 2007 Dec 2007
Palm Coast Sections      

<$200,000

9.3

14.1

15.3

$200,000-300,000

19.0

23.5

36.8

>$300,000

47.4

26.4

45.0

Flagler County      

<$200,000

 

12.6

16.6

$200,000-300,000

 

22.6

35.9

>$300,000

 

32.1

52.3

 

Note: The over $300,000 numbers show more varience because the number of transactions and listing is smaller. A small change makes a big difference.

 

No matter which standard of measure you prefer, the fourth quarter was weakest yet. Most reports had forecast an increase in inventory of homes for sale due to an expected increase in foreclosure properties but the increase didn’t happen. The weakness seems to be caused more by a lack of buyers than an increase in inventory. People are reluctant to buy when a perception prevails that the bottom hasn’t been reached. Remember too that the December numbers do not reflect the condition of the market in December. Because of the time lag between the date of the sales contract and the closing, we are really measuring the market as it existed in October. Would you buy $250,000 worth of stock if the only price you could confirm was the price for which it sold two months ago, especially if you suspected the price was still falling?

 

When will the market reach bottom? I believe it will happen in late 2008, but we won’t know until long after the event. Not only do we have to wait until two months after the sale contract for sales data, but also for several months after to confirm a trend (vs. an anomaly). It will bottom when buyers start entering the market, a few at a time initially, soon to be followed by still more. The inventory will start shrinking while, at the same time, there won’t be any new construction coming on line. For new homes to be available when the market turns, builders would need to start construction months earlier. That’s not likely to happen.

 

Some economists argue that the median price needs to fall to a level affordable by a buyer with the median local household income. This seems to make sense on the surface, but many home purchases in retirement and second home markets, such as ours, are wealth driven rather than income driven. At current exchange rates, you don’t have to be too wealthy in Euros, Pounds, or Yen to be wealthy in Dollars. I forecast a pick up in the volume of sales to foreign buyers.

 

Spring will be a critical time when the local market is typically at its best. On the other hand, it’s also the time when many ARMs are scheduled for rate resets.

4 replies
  1. Janice E. Martin
    Janice E. Martin says:

    Residential Home Market Analysis

    Do all your calculation point to a reduction in real estate taxes in 2008? Since the home values have gone down considerably, will our assessed values our taxes are based on go down also? What impact do you think all this will have on our taxes?

  2. John Adams
    John Adams says:

    Interesting analysis but you missed something

    Toby, very interesting report as always. However, you and the majority of the media missed something very critical. The market did not begin in 2004! Every report that I see compares the current market conditions to either 2004 or 2005. Don\\’t you think that can be a little short sighted? I pulled data from the Volusia County Property Appraiser going all the way back to 1911. I recognize that Flagler County has been much harder hit than Volusia County but the property appraiser data is not readily available for download in Flagler County and the history is clearly not as robust.

    While there is no question that there has been a decline in the past few years, it represents a drop in the bucket compared to the increases that took place in the years leading up to it. Please help me if my chart doesn\\’t show up clearly:

    Year Average Price Percent Change (Annualized) Percent Change from 1980 (Annualized)
    1980 34,718
    1985 40,785 3.5% 3.5%
    1990 62,812 10.8% 8.1%
    1995 74,535 3.7% 7.6%
    2000 96,060 5.8% 8.8%
    2005 213,619 24.5% 20.6%

    I think you\\’ll agree that standard growth of 8-9% was completely overshadowed in the first half of 2000 when our annualized growth jumped to almost 25%! Consider anyone who purchased a home in any period other than the last 24 months. I think you\\’ll have to agree that they are still way ahead in terms of equity. The market is generally stable and certainly favors the long term investor.

    Further, even when looking at the last few years you can see the changes dwarfed by the recent growth. Again, please help if my chart doesn\\’t carry forward properly:

    Year Average Price Percent Change (Annualized) Percent Change from 2000 (Annualized)
    2000 96,060
    2001 103,324 7.6% 7.6%
    2002 118,593 14.8% 11.7%
    2003 135,169 14.0% 13.6%
    2004 163,690 21.1% 17.6%
    2005 213,619 30.5% 24.5%
    2006 249,601 16.8% 26.6%
    2007 235,330 -5.7% 20.7%

    These changes tell me that the market decline is occurring but for anyone with a long term investment, or who plans to make a long term investment, now is the time to move. While property values have declined and a buyer\\’s market exists, this is an excellent opportunity to leverage the equity tat they have accumulated in order to move up into a larger home (while prices of both are lower than they are likely to be in the next few years).

    Looking forward, expect price declines to continue until spring due to our regular seasonality. Beyond that, expect the market to stabilize as our buyer’s market is joined by several other positive indicators:
    1. New home inventory peaked in 2006 and is declining.
    2. The Federal Reserve continues reductions in the Fed Funds Rate.
    3. Prime mortgage interest rates continue at historic lows.
    4. International investment is at an all time high and 26% of international investors are headed for Florida.

    While we won’t likely see price growth at previous levels, the lower prices should increase the number of properties being sold.

  3. Toby
    Toby says:

    Reply to Janice

    This is a complicated issue. I wrote an article covering it November 16th. On the ToToby.com home page, go to the bottom of the articles column. Click on VIEW ALL ARTICLES. All past articles are listed by date.

  4. Toby
    Toby says:

    Reply to John

    I agree. Unfortunately, I don’t have comparable Flagler County date from that period. The big jump in values began in 2001 and 2002. Those who bought then are still way ahead. For those with a long term view, the next 12 to 18 months represent a great opportunity.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply